Email Us
The Trial Lawyer Magazine Logo
SUBSCRIBE

Yamaha Hit with $3.3 Million Verdict for Wanton Conduct
Yamaha Hit with $3.3 Million Verdict for Wanton Conduct

Jury: Yamaha Must Pay Plaintiff $3.3 Million for Injuries Resulting from Flawed Rhino 660 UTV Vehicle

Montgomery, AL – After five hours of deliberation, a jury in Montgomery, Alabama returned a $3.3 million verdict against Yamaha for its wanton conduct in the design, manufacture, marketing, and sale of the Yamaha Rhino Model 660 UTV vehicle. A finding of wantonness means that Yamaha acted or failed to act with a conscious and reckless disregard for the safety of its consumers, knowing that grievous injury was likely to result.

The plaintiff in the case, represented by Levin Papantonio attorneys Fred Levin, Cameron Stephenson, and Aaron Watson, alleged that she sustained grievous injury when her Yamaha Rhino Model 660 overturned on top of her, crushing her when she tried to make a right turn on flat terrain at a slow speed.

The overwhelming evidence against Yamaha proved that shortly after the Rhino Model 660 UTV vehicle went onto the market, consumers and even dealers began receiving reports that users were experiencing overturns while traveling at slow speeds on flat terrain. Rather than recall the vehicle, Yamaha continued to sell the vehicle putting profits over safety as the number of reported injuries continued to increase. Moreover, despite the fact that the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) threatened to make a preliminary determination that the vehicle should be classified as a Hazard A, Yamaha continued to sell, denying any wrongdoing. A Hazard A classification is assigned where it is determined that a defect is substantially likely to cause injury or death.

"In talking to the jury after the trial, the amazing thing was that as a 12-person jury that requires a unanimous verdict, they found liability against the company almost immediately, and the reason for the five hours of deliberation was over the damages," said plaintiff's attorney Fred Levin of Levin Papantonio.

"The jury's verdict confirmed what we knew all along. Once Yamaha knew that there was a problem with this machine, they should have immediately stopped selling and corrected the problem. They did nothing. That is what this case was all about,” said plaintiff's Attorney Aaron Watson of Levin Papantonio.

In finding for the plaintiff, the jury sent a clear message to Yamaha that the public will not tolerate their blatant disregard for safety. The $3.3 million dollar verdict is the largest to date in the Yamaha Rhino national litigation.

If you would like more information on this case or if you would like to speak with one of the attorneys, please contact Karl Frisch at 202-681-2855 x102 or email .

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
The Trial Lawyer Magazine Logo
chevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram